CCPS, E., 1999, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis.
Spicer, T., Havens, J. & Guinnup, D., 1989, User's Guide for the DEGADIS 2.1 Dense Gas Dispersion Model, US Environmental Protection Agency.
DziubiÅski, M., FrÄ tczak, M. & Markowski, A., 2006, Aspects of Risk Analysis Associated with Major Failures of Fuel Pipelines, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(5), PP. 399-408.
EGIG (European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group), 2015, Gas pipeline incidents 9th report, 1970â2013.
Frequencies, B., 2010, Risk Assessment Data Directory, OGP (International Association of Oil and Gas Producers), No. 434-2, Report.
Gharabagh, M.J., Asilian, H., Mortasavi, S.B., Mogaddam, A.Z., Hajizadeh, E. & Khavanin, A., 2009, Comprehensive Risk Assessment and Management of Petrochemical Feed and Product Transportation Pipelines, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(4), PP. 533-539.
Han, Z. & Weng, W., 2010, An Integrated Quantitative Risk Analysis Method for Natural Gas Pipeline Network, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 23(3), PP. 428-436.
Han, Z. & Weng, W., 2011, Comparison Study on Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Assessment Methods for Urban Natural Gas Pipeline Network, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189(1) ), PP. 509-518.
James, M., 2014, Simplified Methods of Using Probit Analysis in Consequence Analysis, Eastman Chemical Company.
Jamshidi, A., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Yakhchali, S.H. & Khaleghi, S. 2013, Developing a New Fuzzy Inference System for Pipeline Risk Assessment, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(1), PP. 197-208.
Jo, Y.D. & Ahn, B.J., 2005, A Method of Quantitative Risk Assessment for Transmission Pipeline Carrying Natural Gas, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 123(1), PP. 1-12.
Jonkman, S., Van Gelder, P. & Vrijling, J., 2003, An Overview of Quantitative Risk Measures for Loss of Life and Economic Damage, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 99(1), PP. 1-30.
Kirchhoff, D. & Doberstein, B., 2006, Pipeline Risk Assessment and Risk Acceptance Criteria in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), PP. 221-234.
Ma, L., Cheng, L. & Manchun, L., 2013a. Quantitative Risk Analysis of Urban Natural Gas Pipeline Networks Using Geographical Information Systems, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), PP. 1183-1192.
Ma, L., Yongshu, L., Lei, L., Manchun, L. & Cheng, L., 2013b. A Novel Method of Quantitative Risk Assessment Based on Grid Difference of Pipeline Sections, Safety Science, 59: 219-226.
Methods of Approximation and Determination of Human Vulnerability for Offshore Major Accident Hazard Assessment, 2013, HSE, Review Date: Version No. 3, -11-01. Author Section: HID OSD.
Muhlbauer, W.K., 2004, Pipeline Risk Management Manual: Ideas, Techniques, and Resources, USA: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Montiel, H., Vilchez, J.A., Arnaldos, J. & Casal, J., 1996, Historical Analysis of Accidents in the Transportation of Natural Gas, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 51(1), PP. 77-92.
Najafi, M. & Baosong, M., 2009, Advances and Experiences with Pipelines and Trenchless Technology for Water, Sewer, Gas, and Oil Applications, ASCE.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmo-spheric Administration, 2007, ALOHA User Manual, http://www.epa.gov/ OEM/cameo/aloha.htm.
Zhou, Y., Hu, G., Li, J. & Diao, C. 2014, Risk Assessment along the Gas Pipelines and its Application in Urban Planning, Land Use Policy, 38, PP. 233-238.
)