Determination of Optimum Geo-Morphometric Parameters to Digital Soil Map (Case Study: Tehran Province, Iran)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Tehran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Varamin, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Todays, geo-morphometric parameters named as environmental co-variates are used to digital soil maps, so that using these data, the results of soil tests are generalized to similar areas. For this object, finding the suitable environmental variables is of special importance. Since understanding changes in land surface processes requires comprehensive identification of the environmental variables present in it (Bishop et al., 2012), and these changes are mainly due to changes in morphology, structure, composition, passage of time, and human activities (Bishop et al., 2003), and considering the importance of selecting appropriate environmental variables to increase the accuracy in preparing a digital map using a geographic information system, this research seeks to identify and introduce these appropriate environmental variables based on data analysis and reliable statistical tests, so that digital maps with the desired accuracy can be prepared in the geographical area of Tehran province.
Materials and Methods: In addition, other researchers' use of the results of this study and the environmental variables introduced in it will result in the use of the same initial variables in the preparation of different digital maps, and as a result, there will be a better possibility of comparison between different digital maps. The importance of this study is that the study of these factors is important and significant, and research results in this field have not been published before in Tehran province, so they can be used by other researchers to prepare digital maps in future studies. The objective of this study was to determine the appropriate environmental data that can be used to a digital soil map of Tehran province. Data were processed and 49 environmental data were statistically analyzed included Digital Elevation Model, Analytical Hillshading, Landforms, Texture, Flow Accumulation, Protection Index, Clusters, Cross-Sectional Curvature, Longitudinal Curvature, LS Factor, Vertical Distance to Channel Network, Topographic Wetness Index, Channel Network Base Level, Valley Depth, Catchment Slope, Slope, Relative Slope Position, Drainage Basins, Closed Depression, Slope Aspect, Convergence Index, Channel Length, Multi-resolution Valley Bottom Flatness Index, Multi-resolution index of ridge top flatness, Modified Catchment Area, Output, Variance, Sunset, Sunrise, Day Length, Bands Sensor, Salinity Index, Gypsum Index, Brightness Index, Carbonate Index, Clay Index, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. These environmental covariates were statistically analyzed and the values with the highest R2, CV and the lowest RMSE were evaluated as favorable environmental data. Based on these results, bands 2, 3, 4 and 8 were introduced as the best bands of Landsat 8 satellite images to evaluate environmental covariates. The selection of environmental data is of special importance in the preparation of digital maps by co-kriging method, on this basis, in this study, the identification of suitable environmental data for the preparation of digital soil maps in Tehran province was targeted.
Results and Discussion: Based on the results of the present study, out of 49 environmental data reviewed, based on statistical analysis, 14 favorable environmental data were selected. Thus, it is concluded that in preparing a digital soil map, to ensure the accuracy of generalization of laboratory measurement results of soil samples to similar areas, DEM, Slope, CNBL, VDCN, Landforms, Texture, Valley Depth can be used, Convergence Index, MRVBF, MRRTF, TWI, Drainage Basins, Channel and Brightness Index were used as desirable auxiliary data in soil studies in the geographical area of Tehran province. This study showed consistency with previous studies in this field regarding correlation coefficients (Zeinali et al., 2016) and (Darstani Farahani et al., 2016).
Conclusion: In another study, bands 1 to 5 and 7 of the TM sensor were found to be suitable for preparing soil salinity maps, which was consistent with the results of this study (Zeinali et al., 2016).The results of these study use to future soil research.

These environmental covariates were statistically analyzed and the values with the highest R2, CV and the lowest RMSE were evaluated as favorable environmental data. Based on these results, bands 2, 3, 4 and 8 were introduced as the best bands of Landsat 8 satellite images to evaluate environmental covariates. The selection of environmental data is of special importance in the preparation of digital maps by co-kriging method, on this basis, in this study, the identification of suitable environmental data for the preparation of digital soil maps in Tehran province was targeted. Based on the results of the present study, out of 49 environmental data reviewed, based on statistical analysis, 14 favorable environmental data were selected. Thus, it is concluded that in preparing a digital soil map, to ensure the accuracy of generalization of laboratory measurement results of soil samples to similar areas, DEM, Slope, CNBL, VDCN, Landforms, Texture, Valley Depth can be used. , Convergence Index, MRVBF, MRRTF, TWI, Drainage Basins, Channel and Brightness Index were used as desirable auxiliary data in soil studies in the geographical area of Tehran province. This study showed consistency with previous studies in this field regarding correlation coefficients (Zeinali et al. 2016) and (Darstani Farahani et al. 2016). In another study, bands 1 to 5 and 7 of the TM sensor were found to be suitable for preparing soil salinity maps, which was consistent with the results of this study (Zeinali et al. 2016).The results of these study use to future soil research.

Keywords


Adhikari, K., Kheir, R., Greve, M., Bøcher, P., Malone, B., Minasny, B., McBratney, A. & Greve, M., 2013, High-Resolution 3-D Mapping of Soil Texture in Denmark, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, PP. 860-876, doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0275.
Amirian-Chakan, A., Minasny, B., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Akbarifazli, R., Darvishpasand, Z. & Khordehbin, S., 2019, Some Practical Aspects of Predicting Texture Data in Digital Soil Mapping, Soil and Tillage Research, 194, P. 104289.
Bishop, M.P., Shroder Jr., J.F. & Colby, J.D., 2003, Remote Sensing and Geomorphometry for Studying Relief Production in High Mountains, Geomorphology, 55(1-4), PP. 345-361.
Bishop, M.P., James, L.A., Shroder Jr., J.F. & Walsh, S.J., 2012, Geospatial Technologies and Digital Geomorphological Mapping: Concepts, Issues and Research, Geomorphology, 137(1), PP. 5-26.
Blaga, L., 2012, Aspects Regarding the Significance of the Curvature Types and Values in the Studies of Geomorphometry Assisted by GIS, Anal. Univ. Oradea Ser. Geogr, 2012, PP. 327-337.
Bock, M., Boehner, J., Conrad, O., Koethe, R. & Ringeler, A., 2007, Methods for Creating Functional Soil Databases and Applying Digital Soil Mapping with SAGA GIS, In: T. Hengl, P. Panagos, A. Jones, G. Toth, [Eds.]: Status and Prospect of Soil Information in South-Eastern Europe: Soil Databases, Projects and Applications, EUR 22646 EN Scientific and Technical Research Series, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, PP. 149-162, http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_ Archive/ eusoils_docs/esb_rr/EUR22646EN.pdf.
Boettinger, J.L., Ramsey, R.D., Bodily, J.M., Cole, N.J., Kienast-Brown, S., Nield, S.J., Saunders, A.M. & Stum, A.K., 2008, Landsat Spectral Data for Digital Soil Mapping, In: A.E. Hartemink, A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca-Santos (Eds.), Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data, Springer Science, Australia, PP. 193-203.
Brenning, A., Bangs, D., Becker, M., Schratz, P. & Polakowski, F., 2018, Package ‘RSAGA’, The Comprehensive R Archive Network, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package= RSAGA.
Brungard, C.W., Boettinger, J.L., Duniway, M.C., Wills, S.A. & Edwards Jr., T.C., 2015, Machine Learning for Predicting Soil Classes in Three Semi-Arid Landscapes, Geoderma, 239-240, PP. 68-83, doi.org/ 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.09.019.
Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., Wehberg, J., Wichmann, V. & Boehner, J., 2015, System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, PP. 1991-2007, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015.
Darestani Farahani, M., Akhondzadeh Henzaei, M. & Ahmadi Givi, F., 2016, Using a Neural Network Algorithm to Prepare a Water Surface Salinity Map from MODIS Satellite Images, Journal of Geographic Information Sepehr, 25(99), PP. 18-5.
Dharumarajan, S., Lalitha, M., Niranjana, K.V. & Hegde, R., 2022, Evaluation of Digital Soil Mapping Approach for Predicting Soil Fertility Parameters—A Case Study from Karnataka Plateau, India, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(5), P. 386.
 
Forkuo, E.K. & Nketia, A.K., 2011, Digital Soil Mapping in GIS Environment for CropLand Suitability Analysis, International journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(1), PP. 133-146.
Fu, W., Zhao, K., Tunney, H. & Zhang, C., 2013, Using GIS and Geostatistics to Optimize Soil Phosphorus and Magnesium Sampling in Temperate Grassland, Soil Science, 178(5), PP. 240-247, doi:10.1097/ss.0b013e 31829d463b.
Gallant, J.C. & Dowling, T.I., 2003, A Multi Resolution Index of Valley Bottom Flatness for Mapping Depositional Areas, Water Resources Research, 39, PP. 1347-1360.
Gao, B., Pan, Y., Chen, Z., Wu, F., Ren, X. & Hu, M., 2016, A Spatial Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling Method for Mapping Using Ancillary Data, Transactions in GIS, 20(5), PP. 735-754.
Godinho Silva, S.H., Owens, P.R., Silva, B.M., César de Oliveira, G., Duarte de Menezes, M., Pinto, L.C. & Curi, N., 2015, Evaluation of Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling as a Support for Soil Mapping and Spatial Variability of Soil Properties, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79(2), PP. 603-611.
Guo, L., 2018, Exploring the Sensitivity of Soil Sample Numbers in Digital Soil Mapping and then Choosing a Suitable Soil Sampling Plan, Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 07, DOI:10.4172/2469-4134-c2-014.
Jochem, A., Wichmann, V. & Hofle, B., 2010, Large Area Point Cloud Based Solar Radiation Modeling, Hamburger Beiträge zur Physischen Geographie und Landschaft-sökologie, 21, P. 20.
Kaneda, H. & Chiba, T., 2019, Stereopaired Morphometric Protection Index Red Relief Image Maps (Stereo MPIRRIMs): Effective Visualization of HighResolution Digital Elevation Models for Interpreting and Mapping Small Tectonic Geomorphic Features, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109(1), PP. 99-109.
Köthe, R. & Bock, M., 2006, Development and Use in Practice of SAGA Modules for High Quality Analysis of Geodata, Free And Open Gis-Saga-Gis, 115, PP. 85-96.
Lacoste, M., Mulder, V., de Forges, A.R., Martin, M. & Arrouays, D., 2016, Evaluating Large-Extent Spatial Modeling Approaches: A Case Study for Soil Depth for France, Geoderma Regional, 7, PP. 137-152, doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.02.006.
Li, J., Heap, A.D., Potter, A. & Daniell, J.J., 2011, Application of Machine Learning Methods to Spatial Interpolation of Environmental Variables, Environ. Modell. Softw., 26, PP. 1647-1659, doi.org/10.1016/ j.envsoft.2011.07.004.
Liess, M., Glaser, B. & Huwe, B., 2012, Uncertainty in the Spatial Prediction of Soil Texture. Comparison of Regression Tree and Random Forest Models, Geoderma, 170, PP. 70-79, doi.org/10.1016/ j.geoderma.2011.10.010.
Malone, B.P., Minansy, B. & Brungard, C., 2019, Some Methods to Improve the Utility of Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling, PeerJ, 7, P. e6451.
Maynard, J.J. & Levi, M.R., 2017, Hyper-Temporal Remote Sensing for Digital Soil Mapping: Characterizing Soil-Vegetation Response to Climatic Variability, Geoderma, 285, PP. 94-109, doi.org/10.1016/ j.geoderma.2016.09.024.
Metternicht, G.I. & Zinck, J.A., 2003, Remote Sensing of Soil Salinity: Potentials and Constraints, Remote Sensing of Environment, 85, PP. 1-20.
Mulder, V., Lacoste, M., de Forges, A.R. & Arrouays, D., 2016, Global Soil Map France: High-Resolution Spatial Modelling the Soils of France up to Two Meter Depth, Sci. Total Environ., 573, PP. 1352-1369, doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.066.
Ngu, N.H., Trung, N.H., Shinjo, H., Chotpantarat, S. & Thanh, N.N., 2025, Improving Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Matter in Central Vietnam Using Bayesian-Enhanced Machine Learning and Environmental Covariates, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 71(1), PP. 1-17.
Nield, S.J., Boettnger, J.L. & Ramsey, R.D., 2007, Digital Mapping Gypsic and Nitric Soil Areas Using Landsat ETM Data, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71, PP. 245-252.
Nussbaum, M., Spiess, K., Baltensweiler, A., Grob, U., Keller, A., Greiner, L. & Papritz, A.J., 2018, Evaluation of Digital Soil Mapping Approaches with Large Sets of Environmental Covariates, Soil, 4(1), PP. 1-22.
Parmar, S., 2019, Morphometry Analysis Using SAGA GIS: A Case Study of Watershed–63 of Narmada River, Gujarat, India, Journal of Engineering Research and Application, (2).
Somarathna, P., Malone, B. & Minasny, B., 2016, Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Content over New South Wales, Australia Using Local Regression Kriging, Geoderma Regional, 7, PP. 38-48, doi.org/10.1016/ j.geodrs.2015.12.002.
Szatmári, G., Barta, K. & Pásztor, L., 2015, An Application of a Spatial Simulated Annealing Sampling Optimization Algorithm to Support Digital Soil Mapping, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64(1), PP. 35-48.
Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., 2015, Determining Spatial Sampling Pattern Using Different Methods (Case Study: Taft County), Agricultural Engineering (Agricultural Scientific Journal), 38(2), PP. 19-36.
Taghizadeh- Mehrjardi, R., Minasny, B., Sarmadian, F. & Malone, B.P., 2014, Digital Mapping of Soil Salinity in Ardakan Region, Central Iran, Geoderma, 213, PP. 15-28.
Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Nabiollahi, K. & Kerry, R., 2016, Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon at Multiple Depths Using Different Data Mining Techniques in Baneh Region, Iran, Geoderma, 266, PP. 98-110, doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.003.
Vaysse, K. & Lagacherie, P., 2015, Evaluating Digital Soil Mapping Approaches for Mapping GlobalSoilMap Soil Properties from Legacy Data in Languedoc-Roussillon (France), Geoderma Regional, 4, PP. 20-30, doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2014.11.003.
Weber, D., Rüetschi, M., Small, D. & Ginzler, C., 2020, Grossflächige Klassifikation von Gebüsch Wald mit Fernerkundungsdaten, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, 171(2), PP. 51-59.
Were, K., Bui, D.T., Dick, Ø.B. & Singh, B.R., 2015, A Comparative Assessment of Support Vector Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Random Forests for Predicting and Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Across an Afromontane Landscape, Ecol. Indic., 52, PP. 394-403, doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.028.
Zawawi, A.A., Shiba, M. & Jemali, N.J.N., 2014, Landform Classification for Site Evaluation and Forest Planning: Integration between Scientific Approach and Traditional Concept, Sains Malaysiana, 43(3), PP. 349-358.
Zeinali, M., Jafarzadeh, A.A., Shahbazi, F. & Ostan, Sh., 2016, Evaluation of Surface Soil Salinity Using Pixel-Based Method Based on TM Sensor Data (Case Study: Lands East of Khoy County- West Azerbaijan Province), Journal of Geographic Information Sepehr, 25(99), PP. 127-139.